TrustLoop vs 360 Reviews
TrustLoop vs 360 Reviews
360s are a once-a-year performance event. TrustLoop is a continuous trust signal — anonymous, lightweight, and focused on behaviour change.
How is TrustLoop different from 360 Reviews? TrustLoop measures professional trust through anonymous colleague reflections using the Trust Equation (Credibility, Reliability, Safety, Self-Orientation), while 360 Reviews focuses on 360-degree feedback. TrustLoop provides continuous, private measurement rather than periodic reviews.
- Weekly micro-feedback vs annual multi-rater assessment
- True anonymity (structural, not policy-based)
- Behaviour-focused Actions instead of competency ratings
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | 360 Reviews | TrustLoop |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Annual | Weekly |
| Time | 45–60 minutes | 5 minutes |
| Anonymity | Attributed (raters known to admins) | Structural — cannot identify |
| Output | Competency rating report | One Action + wording template |
| Focus | Past performance | Forward-looking behaviour change |
Privacy & governance
No names. No ranking. No attribution.
TrustLoop is designed so it cannot be used for surveillance — it is structurally incapable of exposing who said what.
No names. No ranking.
No one can link a score back to an individual.
Aggregated, not attributed.
Signals appear only after combining multiple colleague perspectives.
Patterns, not people.
The system is built to prevent monitoring or employee ranking.
Built-in privacy constraint
Built to be incapable of identifying individuals.
This is not a policy — it is an architectural constraint. TrustLoop cannot surface who said what, even if asked.
Signal submitted
Colleague reflection recorded
Aggregated
Combined with multiple others
Pattern only
Individual signals stripped away
No name. Ever.
Only patterns reach the surface
Ready to replace 360-degree feedback theater with a weekly trust signal?